Legal Opinion

McInerney v. Wm. P. McDonald Const. Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 11, 1939No. 185PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

As was indicated at the argument of this motion, defendant’s objections to inter rogatories 1 to 13, inclusive, and 20 and 21, in so far as they ask for information as to defendant’s process since the filing of the bill of, complaint, are sustained.

The objections to interrogatories 1 to 3, inclusive, 8 to 14, inclusive, and 18 to 21, inclusive, are sustained for the same reason, namely, that the activities or operations of the defendant since the filing of the complaint effect neither the issue of validity nor infringement. The rules of civil procedure cannot be…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cinema Amusements, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
  2. Carlson Companies, Inc. v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1974
  3. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. ByrnesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  4. United States v. Columbia Steel Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
  5. Gagen v. Northam Warren Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API