Legal Opinion

In re S.H.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 2013PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY PANELEA, J.:

In a matter of first impression, and one which we are told has significant statewide ramifications, we must decide whether an order for Permanent Legal’Custody entered pursuant to the Juvenile Act prohib1 its a parent from later seeking primary custody. This question necessitates review of issues surrounding the interpretation of key provisions of the Juvenile Act; the best interests of children; the historic and statutory right of parents to enjoy the companionship and custody of their children; and correlation of the permanency policies set forth in the federal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Winslow-Quattlebaum v. Maryland Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Martin v. DOT, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Hiller v. FauseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. J.S. v. WhetzelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. In re B.L.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. LehmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. In re Adoption of J.N.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. In re DelevieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. In the Interest of D.C.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API