In the Interest of D.C.D.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
DONOHUE, J.:
J.T.W. (“Father”) appeals from the trial court’s July 23, 2013 decree, which granted the petitions filed by Clinton County Children and Youth Services (“CYS” or “the Agency”) to involuntarily terminate his parental rights to D.C.D. (“Child”) pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 2511(a)(2) and (b). Upon review, we find that the orphans’ court erred as a matter of law by terminating Father’s parental rights in spite of its finding that CYS failed to provide him with reasonable efforts to promote reunification prior to filing its termination petition. We therefore reverse.
In deciding…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re William L.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- In re T.S.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- In re Adoption of S.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Hiller v. FauseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- In Re DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In the Int of: D.C.D./ Appeal of: Clinton Co C&YSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- In Re: A.C., Appeal of: Somerset County CYSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- In the Int of: D.C.D./ Appeal of: Clinton Co C&YSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014