Legal Opinion

Woliner v. Woliner

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 10, 1975PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

132 N.J. Super. 216 (1975)

333 A.2d 283

ESTELLE WOLINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT,

v.

JACK WOLINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 13, 1975.

Decided February 10, 1975.

Before Judges MICHELS, MORGAN and MILMED.

Mr. Neil Braun argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent (Messrs. Rudd and Ackerman, attorneys).

Mr. Ernest Prupis argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant (Messrs. Weltchek, Prupis & Ritz, attorneys).

2Per curiam

Plaintiff wife instituted the present action pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, seeking support from…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Meeker v. MEEKERSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  4. Slapp v. SlappOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Levy v. LevyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Kazin v. KazinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Chaudry v. ChaudryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  4. Mendell v. MendellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Manfrini v. ManfriniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API