Legal Opinion
City of New Rochelle v. Friedman
New Rochelle City Court
Decided October 9, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRubin, J.
The defendant Friedman is charged on the complaint of the Building Inspector of the City of New Rochelle with having on October 26, 1946, at 30 Eastchester Road in this City, “ wilfully and unlawfully violated Article VII, Sec. 1, of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of New Rochelle, by conducting a business on the premises at the above place, to-wit, by maintaining the business office of a summer camp at said place ”.
The corporate defendant stands charged by the same complaint with having committed a violation of the same ordinance provision, by permitting the defendant Friedman to so…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- A. B. Small Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Matter of Geiffert v. MealeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Matter of De Vries v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Village of East Hampton v. MulfordNew York Supreme Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. Cully Realty, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1981
- Simon v. Board of Appeals on ZoningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Linehan-Leary Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Mack v. Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 2005