Legal Opinion

Village of East Hampton v. Mulford

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStoddabt, J.

Plaintiff, Village of East Hampton, seeks to permanently enjoin the defendant from conducting a riding academy on his premises as being in violation of the Zoning Ordinance enacted by the village on May 19,1925.

The evidence discloses that defendant’s premises are located in residential district Zone A. It appears that the premises in question have been owned by the defendant and his ancestors for more than a century. At some time in the past stables were erected on the property for the housing of horses used for agricultural purposes. However, since about April 1, 1946, the defendant has…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Town of Huntington v. Park Shore Country Day Camp of Dix Hills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Town of Los Altos Hills v. Adobe Creek Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Imbergamo v. BarclayNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Possekel v. O'DONNELLAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Withers v. Pulaski County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API