Legal Opinion

Bernhardt v. Ingham Regional Medical Center

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2002No. Docket 226124PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right the order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(4) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

According to plaintiff’s first amended complaint, she visited defendant Ingham Regional Medical Center (the hospital) on August 7, 1997, to bring home her adopted newborn son. Before visiting the baby, she removed her jewelry while scrubbing her hands and arms. Plaintiff left the jewelry at the washbasin and forgot to retrieve it before returning home. The jewelry consisted of an 1897 diamond ring and a 1980 Seiko watch.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Daley v. LaCroixMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Graham v. FordMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Koester v. VCA Animal HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Iler v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beckie Price v. High Pointe Oil Co IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Price v. High Pointe Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Nick Allen v. David SargentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022
  4. Alisa a Peskin-Shepherd Pllc v. Nicole BlumeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Cambridge Dental LLC v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API