Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Mann
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided November 28, 1923No. 479-3873PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
On December 16, 1910, the defendant in error, O. D. Mann, executed the following stock subscription obligation, to wit:
“Whereas, Commonwealth Organization Company, of Fort Worth, Texas, are promoting the organization of a Casualty, Bonding & Accident Insurance Company, to be incorporated in pursuance of the laws of the state of Texas, under the name of Commonwealth Bonding & Accident Insurance Company, or such other name as may be selected, with an authorized capital stock of three hundred thousand dollars, and a paid-up capital of at least two hundred thousand dollars, paid up and free from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Newton Nat. Bank v. NewbeginCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Wiebusch v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Texas Elevator & Compress Co. v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Kendall v. RileyTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Owensboro Seating & Cabinet Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hunt v. WroeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Whitehead v. WickerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Lutz v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924