Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Mann

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1923No. 479-3873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

On December 16, 1910, the defendant in error, O. D. Mann, executed the following stock subscription obligation, to wit:

“Whereas, Commonwealth Organization Company, of Fort Worth, Texas, are promoting the organization of a Casualty, Bonding & Accident Insurance Company, to be incorporated in pursuance of the laws of the state of Texas, under the name of Commonwealth Bonding & Accident Insurance Company, or such other name as may be selected, with an authorized capital stock of three hundred thousand dollars, and a paid-up capital of at least two hundred thousand dollars, paid up and free from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newton Nat. Bank v. NewbeginCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  2. Wiebusch v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Texas Elevator & Compress Co. v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Kendall v. RileyTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Owensboro Seating & Cabinet Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WroeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Whitehead v. WickerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Lutz v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API