Legal Opinion

Territory ex rel. Scott v. Stuart

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Motion to Quash.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

WATSON, J.

In a petition for a writ of mandamus filed in this court on May 1, 1915, seeking to compel Judge Stuart of the first judicial circuit to transfer and assign a certain cause then pending in said first circuit court to some other court or judge having jurisdiction thereof and not disqualified, it is alleged that respondent by reason of a pecuniary interest in the subject matter of said suit is, under section 84 of the Organic Act of this Territory, disqualified to make any order in said cause other than one transferring and assigning the same as aforesaid. An…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Siegrist v. ArnotMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. State ex rel. Pensacola & Louisville Railroad v. VanNessSupreme Court of Florida · 1875

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Marsland v. ShintakuHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Akana v. DamonHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Brown v. HawkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Fong v. SapienzaHawaii Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State ex rel. Kaneshiro v. HuddyHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API