Legal Opinion

State v. Tomlin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1992No. 91-2092PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The sole issue certified to this court is whether the element of “chronic alcoholism]” enumerated in R.C. 2923.13(A)(4) may be established by testimony or other evidence provided by an individual other than a medical doctor. For the reasons that follow, we answer such query in the affirmative.

R.C. 2923.13 provides, in pertinent part, with respect to having weapons under a disability:

“(A) Unless relieved from disability as provided in section 2923.14 of the Revised Code, no person shall knowingly acquire, have, carry, or use any firearm or dangerous ordnance, if any of the following apply:

(( *…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Alexander v. Mt. Carmel Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Doyle v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. MaupinOhio Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HartmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. HartmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. SemenchukOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API