Legal Opinion

Thurn v. McAra

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1964No. Calendar 4, Docket 50,359PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

Many, if not most, courts in this country, as well as England’s, impose constructive trusts upon property acquired by intestate succession by one who induced a decedent to make no will by expressly or impliedly agreeing to'bold such property for tbe benefit of another and, after death of the deeedent.,intestate, refuses to do so. The. authorities, none fr-ona Michigan, are collected in the classic texts ’ on equity, trusts, and restitution, including among them 4 Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence (5th ed, 1941), §§ 1054, 1054c; 1 Scott, Trusts (2d ed, 1956), §§ 55.1, 55.3, 55.9; 1 Restatement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kent v. KleinMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Burgess v. Jackson Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Nelson v. WoodworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Hewelt v. HeweltMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Haack v. BurmeisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cruz v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  2. Kendysh v. Holy Spirit Byelorussian Autocephalic Orthodox ChurchDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  3. Zones LLC v. YousafDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API