Legal Opinion
Houston v. Cavanagh
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 15, 1991No. A90A2259PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Judge.
We granted interlocutory review to consider the trial court’s denial of a motion to recuse by counsel for appellant/plaintiff Sargus Houston. The motion to recuse came after the underlying case was settled and followed the filing of a claim for attorney fees and costs pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14 by appellees/defendants Harrison D. Cavanagh, M.D., Emory University d/b/a Emory University Hospital and Emory Clinic.
Following extended discovery proceedings which resulted in appeals to this court and the Supreme Court in Emory Univ. v. Houston, 185 Ga. App. 289 (364 SE2d 70) (1987) and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Savage v. SavageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Emory Clinic v. HoustonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- Mann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Emory University v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baptiste v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Stephens v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Datz v. BrinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Morgan v. PropstCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.