Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Medina

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1987No. F005627PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARTIN, J.

—Appellants Danny and John Medina and codefendants Tomas Moraga and Norma Linda Muniz were charged by information as follows:

Count one charged appellants and Moraga with unlawful possession for sale of heroin in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11351, and count two charged appellants and Moraga with the unlawful sale of heroin in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11352. Counts one and two each contained a special allegation alleging appellants and Moraga possessed for sale 14.25 or more grams of a substance containing heroin within the meaning of Penal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WojtynaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. People v. KochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. People v. GesnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. People v. BullockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API