Legal Opinion
Florencio Cuevas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 10, 2013No. 19-90020PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
Florencio Cuevas seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) concluding that Cuevas was inadmissible because there was reason to believe he was a drug trafficker. Because the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) presented sufficient evidence to demonstrate that it had reason to believe Cuevas was an illegal trafficker, the petition for review is DISMISSED.
I
Florencio Cuevas is a native and citizen of Mexico who was a legal permanent resident of the United States. While reentering the United States from Mexico in 2005, Cuevas’s car was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Zhu Yu Chun v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Rosalina Lopez-Umanzor v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Luis Alarcon-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Balogun v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manuel Chavez-Reyes v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Mena-Flores v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- People v. N. River Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Agustin Rojasin v. Merrick B. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Robson De Maria v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020