Legal Opinion
Rosalina Lopez-Umanzor v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 6, 2005No. 03-72014PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Rosalina Lopez-Umanzor petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) finding her ineligible for cancellation of removal and denying her request for voluntary departure. An immigration judge (“IJ”) had found Petitioner to be ineligible for relief because there was “reason to believe” that she had been involved in drug trafficking, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(C); the IJ disbelieved her testimony to the contrary. On appeal of the IJ’s decision, the BIA rejected Petitioner’s due process arguments and affirmed the IJ’s adverse credibility…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gil Ilano Colmenar,petitioner v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Raquel Sanchez-Cruz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Ranjeet Kaur v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Emmanuel Senyo Agyeman v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Zi Lin Chen v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Soto-Olarte v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Ali v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Galina Ivanovna Smolniakova v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Kadia v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Qun Wang v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.