Legal Opinion
United States v. Dunham Concrete Products, Inc., Louisiana Ready-Mix Company, Anderson-Dunham, Inc., United States of America v. Ted F. Dunham, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1974No. 74-1903PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEE, Circuit Judge:
This is a sequel to United States of America v. Dunham Concrete Products, Inc., et al., 475 F.2d 1241 (5th Cir. 1973). In that opinion we affirmed Sherman and Hobbs Act convictions of Ted Dunham, Jr., and certain of his corporations stemming from Dunham’s use of labor racketeers against persons who purchased supplies from his competitors. 1 Certiorari was denied. 2 Dunham and the corporations then filed various motions for post-conviction relief. Dunham’s •§ 2255 3 motion was granted and a new trial ordered as to him; all corporate motions were denied. The United States…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. MantonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Donathan Wayne HaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Gerald GordonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Cpc International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Holly Butcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Mitchell Thomas Blazak, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. James R. Ricketts, Donald Wawrzaszek, Respondents-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.