Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Cpc International Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GEE, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. after a jury verdict of monopolization under the Sherman Act. Because we find that the section 2 monopolization verdict cannot, as a matter of law, stand, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Sixty-six years ago, the United States charged a defendant, Corn Products Refining Company, with combining illegally in restraint of trade and monopolizing in violation of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act.1 Then District Judge Learned Hand, in an opinion long familiar to students of…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Quality Foods De Centro America, S.A. And Duroparts De El Salvador, S.A. v. Latin American Agribusiness Development Corporation, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Valley Liquors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Renfield Importers, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- The Domed Stadium Hotel, Inc., D/B/A Holiday Inn-Superdome v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Alexandro Puga v. About Tyme Transport, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Rebel Oil Company, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.