Legal Opinion

Motiograph, Inc. v. Matthews

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 10, 1977No. 19242PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Justice.

W. D. Matthews sued his employer, Moti-ograph, Inc., seeking damages for the breach of an employment contract. When Motiograph failed to answer the suit, the district court, after a hearing, rendered a default judgment for Matthews in the sum of $24,186, together with $3,500 in attorney’s fees. Subsequently Motiograph moved to have the judgment set aside; however, the motion was overruled, and Motiograph now appeals. We affirm.

The basic question on this appeal is whether Motiograph demonstrated sufficient grounds to justify vacation of the default judgment. Our particular…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Harris v. LebowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. City of San Antonio v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Martin v. VenturaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Pevehouse, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  2. Nichols v. TMJ CO., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  3. Royal Zenith Corp. v. Martinez, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1985
  4. BancTEXAS McKinney, N.A. v. Desalination Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  5. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Drewery Construction Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API