Legal Opinion

City of Fort Scott v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1903No. 13,355PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Bourbon district court; Walter L, Simons, judge.

1Per curiam

This action was brought by William Elliott against the city of Fort Scott to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by falling into an excavation negligently permitted to exist in one of the public streets of the city. From a judgment against it the city prosecutes error.

An objection was sustained by the court to the reading of an affidavit as the deposition of an absent witness, on the ground that the matter contained in the affidavit was hearsay. In this we think the court committed no error. A small portion of the matter contained in the affidavit was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Atchison v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Ex Parte ShowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Beard v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Educ. of Common School Dist.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. White v. City of Bonner SpringsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API