Markham v. Prutsman Mirror Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CHEZEM, Judge.
Case Summary
Cross-claimant/ Appellant, Prutsman Mirror Co. (Prutsman), and Cross-defendant/Appellee, Groves Manufacturing Company (Groves), were dismissed as defendants in a underlying products liability action brought by G.W. Markham and Nancy Markham. Thereafter, Prutsman and Groves filed cross motions for summary judgment as to Prutsman’s cross-claim. It is from the granting of Groves’ motion 1 for summary judgment that Prutsman now appeals. We affirm.
Issue
While Prutsman raises several issues, we find that there is one determinative issue involved: whether Prutsman had…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Havert v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Polius v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Osgood v. Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Wilkerson v. CO Porter MacHinery Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Reeder v. RamseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- National Soffit & Escutcheons, Incorporated v. Superior Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Hart v. Steel Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rodriguez v. Tech Credit Union Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.