Legal Opinion

Marriage of Ondrasek v. Ondrasek

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 9, 1985No. 84-1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

Margaret Ondrasek appeals and Keith Ondrasek cross-appeals from various terms of a judgment of divorce.

Margaret appeals the property division award, claiming that the trial court erred: (1) by excluding the accounts receivable of Keith’s law firm; (2) in finding no value for the work in progress at the law firm, and (3) by discounting the value of real estate and a building of the law firm by the amount of estimated capital gains tax due upon their hypothetical sale. We affirm the trial court’s valuation of the work in progress. We reverse the trial court’s exclusion of accounts receivable.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Wetzel v. WetzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Wahl v. WahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Bahr v. BahrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In RE MARRIAGE OF RAZ v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Ondrasek v. Circuit Court for Calumet CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  3. Meeks v. MeeksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. In RE MARRIAGE OF STASEY v. StaseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Steinmann v. SteinmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API