Legal Opinion

United States v. Rubin/Chambers, Dunhill Insurance Services

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 20, 2011No. 09 Cr. 1058PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.

Defendants Rubin/Chambers, Dunhill Insurance Services, Inc. (“CDR”); David Rubin (“Rubin”); Zevi Wolmark a/k/a Stewart Wolmark (“Wolmark”); and Evan Andrew Zarefsky (“Zarefsky”) (collectively, “Defendants”) were indicted on October 29, 2009 and charged with crimes arising out of an alleged conspiracy by Defendants and others to illegally rig bids, fix prices and manipulate the market for investment instruments known as municipal derivatives. On December 7, 2010, the Government filed a superseding indictment (the “Indictment”) alleging nine…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Dolan v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. United States v. Rubin/Chambers, Dunhill Insurance ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. United States v. Rubin/ChambersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API