Legal Opinion
United States v. Rubin/Chambers, Dunhill Insurance Services
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 4, 2011No. 09 Cr. 1058PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
Defendants Rubin/Chambers, Dunhill Insurance Services, Inc. (“CDR”); David Rubin (“Rubin”); Zevi Wolmark a/k/a Stewart Wolmark (“Wolmark”); and Evan Andrew Zarefsky (“Zarefsky”) (collectively, “Defendants”) were indicted on October 29, 2009 and charged with crimes arising out of an alleged conspiracy by Defendants and others to illegally rig bids, fix prices and manipulate the market for investment instruments known as municipal derivatives. On December 7, 2010, the Government filed a superseding indictment alleging nine counts. 1
One of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States ex rel. Carter v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- United States v. WeaverDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. Rubin/ChambersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. SaffariniaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020