McGinnis v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.
We must determine whether the State qualified as an employer under the industrial welfare act (IWA), chapter 49.12 RCW, prior to 2003. If it did, we must determine whether the legislature’s 2003 amendment to the IWA, clarifying that the State is not an employer generally, may apply retroactively.
We find that the State was not an employer under the IWA generally at least as early as 1988. We therefore affirm, on different grounds, the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the State. Because our finding disposes of the controversy in this case, we will not consider the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- > FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, TENINO AERIE NO. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Fraternal Order of Eagles, Tenino Aerie No. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Wingert v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- BALLARD SQUARE CONDOMINIUM v. Dynasty Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Bullseye Distributing, L.L.C. v. Gambling CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Bullseye Distributing, LLC v. State, Gambling Com'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Haselwood v. Bremerton Ice Arena, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Haselwood v. Bremerton Ice Arena, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.