In the Interest of R.H.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights to her three children. In her sole issue on appeal, the appellant contends that • the trial court erred in denying her motion for new trial because she met the requirements articulated in Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc., 134 Tex. 388, 133 S.W.2d 124, 126 (1939). We reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
BACKGROUND
Appellant’s rights to her three children, ages 5, 3-1/2, and 1-1/2, were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. MoodyTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Jackson v. Mares, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Guaranty Bank v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In the Interest of K.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Brandon Scott Kelley v. Nicole Lee Sweeney, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- In Re L.A.S., a Child v. ., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2023
- In Re RH, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- In the Interest of K.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.