Burns v. Commencement Bay Land & Improvement Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scott, J. —
The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal because no motion for a new trial was made in the court below. We have previously held, in Jones v. Jenkins, 3 Wash. 17, that a motion for a new trial was not necessary, except to call the attention of the court and to obtain a ruling upon matters which had not been previously presented, and which there had been no opportunity to present during the progress of the trial. In this action, when the plaintiff had introduced his proof, the defendant moved for a non-suit, which the court granted. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- New York & New Haven Railroad v. KetchumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
- Ten Eyck v. Pontiac, Oxford & Port Austin RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Jones v. JenkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Wonderful Group Mining Co. v. RandWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Dial v. Inland Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Keilhamer v. West Coast Telephone Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Brown v. Wilcox Lumber & Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.