Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Trayer

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 24, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, Senior Judge.

The sole but extremely important question which is raised in this case is whether the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania1 is appli*34cable in a forfeiture proceeding. If so, the Commonwealth’s petition for forfeiture should be dismissed.

Walter E. Trayer, pro se appellant in this action, was convicted of possession with intent to deliver cocaine and marijuana. He was sentenced to five to ten years in the state prison. Trayer filed a petition to return certain property and the Commonwealth filed a petition for forfeiture of the property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. Wingait FarmsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. HigginbottomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. ReynoldsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API