Legal Opinion
State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. Long
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided May 2, 2017No. Case No. 2:15-cv-00046-KGBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge
Before the .Court is plaintiff State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.’s (“State Farm”) motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 41). Defendant Ralph Matarazzo has responded in opposition to the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 46). Defendant Grant Long, Jr. has not responded; a default was previously entered against Mr. Long in this matter (Dkt. No. 23). For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 41).
*940I. Procedural Background
Mr. Matarazzo asserts that Mr. Long was diiving a vehicle insured…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Everyday Learning Corporation, - Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Cheryl Larson, - Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Prudential Insurance Company v. Curtis R. Hinkel, Appellant/cross-Appellee, Anna Hinkel, a Minor, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Buford v. TremayneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. MoodyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2021
- Westfield Insurance Company v. Advanced Auto Transport, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020