Williams v. Markt
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
This is a civil action for breach of an oral contract. The judgment is affirmed.
Appellant presents two points which, in summary, charge the trial court erred (1) in denying appellant’s motion to dismiss upon the premise that the action was barred by the statute of limitations; and (2) in refusing to submit appellant’s tendered instructions on the defense of the statute of limitations.
The pertinent facts are as follows:
At the time in question, respondent was the owner/operator of an over-the-road trucking business. Appellant was a lessee of respondent, and appellant would…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Green v. BootheMissouri Court of Appeals · 1945
- Warlick v. PetersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
3Cited by2 opinions
- Forry v. Department of Natural ResourcesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Midstates Resources Corp. v. Farmers Aerial Spraying Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1996