Legal Opinion
Midstates Resources Corp. v. Farmers Aerial Spraying Service, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided February 9, 1996No. 1:95-mj-00043PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CUMMINGS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Midstates Resources Corp. (“Mid-states”) has sued defendants Farmers Aerial Spraying Services, Inc., a/k/a Farmers Aerial Spraying, a/k/a Farmer Aerial Spraying, Inc. (“FASS”), Kenneth D. Russell, and Sherry Russell to recover on certain defaulted notes, security agreements, and guaranties. The defendants admit that they both made and defaulted on these obligations. Defendants’ sole defense to this suit is limitations. As all material facts are undisputed, both Midstates and defendants as a group have each moved for summary judgment. This opinion…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter v. Roy William Bledsoe, Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Jackson v. ThweattTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver of Jasper Federal Savings & Loan Association v. John H. SealeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc. v. Osvaldo CardonaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Blusal Meats, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- SMS Financial, Ltd. Liability Co. v. ABCO Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- PNL Asset Management Co. v. Brenden & Taylor PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- United States v. J.R. LaPointe & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1996
- Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- National Asset Placement Corp. v. Western Securities (USA) Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.