Legal Opinion

Wattles v. Slater

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1908No. Docket No. 48PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Lapeer; Smith, J. Bill by Oliver H. Wattles against Frank Slater, Louisa B. Slater, Grace Slater, and the Huber Manufacturing Company for the foreclosure of certain mortgages. From a decree for complainant for one of the mortgages only, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

The bill of complaint was filed in this cause to foreclose two certain mortgages upon certain land in Lapeer county. Defendant Huber Manufacturing Company is joined under the statute as a subsequent mortgagee. The bill was taken as confessed by the Slaters. The Huber Manufacturing Company answered, claiming priority over complainant’s mortgages. The mortgage to this defendant was in fact given subsequent to the complainant’s mortgages, and was to secure the price of a threshing outfit purchased from this defendant by Frank Slater and another. The written order for this *667machinery recited that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson, Lansing & Saginaw Railroad v. DavisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hains v. HainsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. St. Helen Shooting Club v. BarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Independent Oil & Gas Co. v. SheltonUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Lacny v. AlexanderMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API