Legal Opinion
Hains v. Hains
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from Livingston. (Newton, J.) Bill filed to enforce specific performance of contract. Defendant Horace Hains appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The bill was filed in this cause in the circuit court for the county of Livingston, in chancery, for the specific performance of the following contract:
“Articles of agreement made this twenty-second day of August, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three, between Elihu Hains, of Hartland, *582county of Livingston, State of Michigan,of the first part, and Ephraim E. Hains, of the same place, the party of the second part, in the manner following:
“ The. said party of the first part, in consideration of the sum of one hundred dollars to him duly paid, and the covenants and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Mayor of Baltimore v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Deputy Commissioner of Agriculture v. O. & A. Electric Co-Operative, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Smelsey v. Guarantee Finance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Cherry River National Bank v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- St. Helen Shooting Club v. BarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.