Legal Opinion

Eckl v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1931No. 29,955PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an appeal from a’judgment of the district court confirming on appeal an award of compensation made by the commission of workmen’s compensation under the workmen’s compensation act.

On August 18, 1928, appellee was employed by the Sinclair Refining Company as an agent for the selling and delivering of gasoline. On the morning in question he had just filled up his truck and hung the hose upon the hook when this hose fell, striking him *286in the head and spilling gasoline over his clothing and body, especially into his eyes. At that time he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Shanklin Walnut Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Nashville State Bank v. WeiserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Reeves v. SroadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Richardson v. National Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Williams v. Cities Service Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. United States ex rel. Hallenbeck v. Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. Fitzwater v. Boeing Airplane Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Bull v. S. Patti Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API