Legal Opinion

First Protestant Reformed Church v. DeWolf

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1956No. Docket 39, Calendar 46,659PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This case comes here through an appeal by the defendant Hubert DeWolf and several •other individuals who are in accord with his claims, seeking to set aside a decree of the superior court of Grand Rapids which holds that the legal and only board of directors of the plaintiff First Protestant Reformed Church of Grand Rapids, a Michigan -ecclesiastical corporation, is the consistory of said •church of which one Herman Hoeksema is president and one Gerrit Stadt is clerk. Hereinafter, for brevity and clarity, the plaintiff may, on occasion, be referred to as the Hoeksema church, and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. MeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Borgman v. BultemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Berry v. BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. United Armenian Brethren Evangelical Church v. KazanjianMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Van Vliet v. Vander NaaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Davis v. ScherMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. MacIejewski v. BreitenbeckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. First Protestant Reformed Church of Grand Rapids v. DeWolfMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Second Protestant Reformed Church v. BlankespoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Protestant Reformed Church of Edgerton v. TempelmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API