Legal Opinion

Bailey v. United Airlines, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 2000No. Civil Action 97-5223PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOWELL A. REED, Jr., Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff James Bailey (“Bailey”) initiated this lawsuit, claiming he was terminated in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Presently before the Court is the motion of defendant United Airlines, Incorporated (“United”) for summary judgment (Document No. 33), and the response and replies thereto. Because this suit is premised on a violation of the ADEA, this Court has original jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted.

I.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. James Bailey v. United AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Van Horn v. Suhor Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Miller v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Bailey v. United AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API