Legal Opinion

Boyer Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 13, 1953No. Appeal, 64PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Allen Mi Stearne,

The single question presented by this appeal is whether a pecuniary legacy in a codicil is cumulative or substitutionary. The court below ruled that the legacy is cumulative, and from that ruling the appeal is taken.

The professionally drawn will of Annie G-. Boyer, the testatrix, had its thirty-four items respectively indicated by Roman numerals. Probated with this will is the holographic codicil consisting of five items which testatrix also indicated by Roman numerals. They were respectively numbered I, IV, IX, XIX and XXVI. Similarly numbered items…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sigel's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Braun EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Schattenberg's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Rainear's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Warne's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Buzby EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Dwight EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Crooks EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Holt EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Johnson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API