Legal Opinion

Hugill v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 1, 1990No. Nos. C14-86-543-CR, A14-86-547-CR, B14-86-548-CR, C14-86-549-CR and A14-86-550-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

SEARS, Justice.

Appellant entered a plea of not guilty before a jury to five counts of securing execution of a document by deception. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 32.46. He was convicted of all five counts, and sentenced to imprisonment for three years for each count, the sentences to run concurrently.

On original submission before this court, appellant raised a single point of error, asserting that submission of an instruction to the jury on the law of parole, pursuant to Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 37.07, § 4, violates the constitutional separation of powers, thereby mandating…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Wheatly v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Floyd Edward Hendrix v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  2. Lynn Rex Glover v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API