Legal Opinion

Edison Electric Co. v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided November 20, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, District Judge.

1. Construing the notice given by complainants to defendants for the taking of testimony as a notice that complainants desired the testimony in the cause to be taken *461orally, and following the case of Bischoffscheim v. Baltzer (C. C.) 10 Fed. 1, I think it proper to permit the defendants to cross-examine Sir William Thomson orally, if they so elect. Such election must be made within 10 days from date.

2. If defendants elect to cross-examine orally, such cross-examination must immediately follow the close of the direct examination. The commissioner will not be directed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bischoffscheim v. BaltzerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The TitanicDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1913
  2. Encyclopædia Britannica Co. v. Werner Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API