United States v. Tuggle
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
This case involves the execution of contingent confinement based upon a convicted servicemember’s failure to pay an adjudged fine. We hold that the convening *90authority erred by ordering contingent confinement to be executed without giving full consideration to appellant’s offer to pay the fine in installments. RCM 1113(d)(3), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984.
I
Appellant was tried by a military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial at Fort Polk, Louisiana. He pleaded guilty to and was convicted of one specification of making a false official…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. StebbinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. CowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. GainesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.