Legal Opinion

United States v. Tuggle

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 21, 1992No. 66,125; CM 8902672PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

This case involves the execution of contingent confinement based upon a convicted servicemember’s failure to pay an adjudged fine. We hold that the convening *90authority erred by ordering contingent confinement to be executed without giving full consideration to appellant’s offer to pay the fine in installments. RCM 1113(d)(3), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984.

I

Appellant was tried by a military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial at Fort Polk, Louisiana. He pleaded guilty to and was convicted of one specification of making a false official…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. StebbinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  2. United States v. CowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  4. United States v. GainesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  5. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API