Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Powers

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1857Published

Appeal from the County Court of the County of Calaveras. This was an action, brought by Freeman and others, for the recovery of the possession of a mining claim, before a justice of the peace, who rendered judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs appealed to the County Court, where a trial de novo was had, and judgment entered for the plaintiffs.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the County Court of the County of Calaveras. This was an action, brought by Freeman and others, for the recovery of the possession of a mining claim, before a justice of the peace, who rendered judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs appealed to the County Court, where a trial de novo was had, and judgment entered for the plaintiffs. On the trial in the County Court, the defendants offered to prove one of the allegations in their answer, that the claim in controversy exceeded in value the sum of two hundred dollars, which the Court refused to permit them to do. Defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtTerry, J.

The jurisdiction of justices of the peace is limited by the Constitution to cases in which the amount involved does not exceed two hundred dollars, excepting in proceedings arising under the statute concerning forcible entry and detainer. See Zander w. Coe, 5 Cal.; and V an Etten & Steel v. Jilson, and Hart v. Moon, 6 Cal., 19 and 161.

It follows that the Court erred in refusing to allow defendant to prove the value of the mining-claim, as alleged in his answer.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Van Etten & Steele v. JilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856