Van Etten & Steele v. Jilson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court of Nevada County. The plaintiffs brought their action in a Justice’s Court to recover possession of a mining claim, and for damages for injuries done thereto by defendants. The defendants answered, and on trial moved to dismiss the action, for the reason that two causes of action were improperly united. The Justice overruled the motion.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the County Court of Nevada County. The plaintiffs brought their action in a Justice’s Court to recover possession of a mining claim, and for damages for injuries done thereto by defendants. The defendants answered, and on trial moved to dismiss the action, for the reason that two causes of action were improperly united. The Justice overruled the motion. The jury found a verdict for defendants, and judgment was entered accordingly, from which plaintiffs appealed to the County Court. There the motion to dismiss was renewed and granted, and the action dismissed. Plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.
Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
Justices of the Peace cannot take any jurisdiction by implication. The law gives them the authority to try the right to a mining claim where the value does not exceed two hundred dollars, but it confers no jurisdiction to give damages for an injury to a mining claim, or for its detention.
But this is not the case here. The plaintiff sues for the mining claim—that is the cause of his action. His prayer for damages might have been stricken out, or might have been disregarded. It ought not to have turned…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Peninsular Trading & Fishing Co. v. Pacific Steam Whaling Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Swain v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Armstrong v. PaulNevada Supreme Court · 1865
- Wratten v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Freeman v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857