Legal Opinion

DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK v. SUNOCO PIPELINE L.P.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02447Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER : NETWORK, et al., : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Civ. No. 18-2447 : SUNOCO PIPELINE L.P., : Defendant. : Diamond, J. April 16, 2020 MEMORANDUM The Delaware Riverkeeper Network and “Riverkeeper” Maya van Rossum charge that Sunoco Pipeline L.P. violated the Clean Water Act when the Company did not seek a federal permit for its Mariner East II Pipeline Project after regulatory authorities advised that because only a nearly identical state permit was required, they would not issue a federal permit. Surely…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API