Kerchner v. . Fairley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from an Order made at Spring Term, 1878, of RICHMOND Superior Court, by Moore, J. Pending the action and on application of the plaintiff, the court below made an order for the appointment of a receiver, upon the facts which are sufficiently set out by Mr. Justice Dillard in delivering the opinion. From this order the defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDillard, J.
The plaintiff is a mortgagee of the lands in the two deeds mentioned in the pleadings, conveyed to him as a security of three several promissory notes amounting in the aggregate to the sum of $8,801.34, with interest at eight per cent; for all of which the deed of John Fairley and wife is a security, and for one of which only, the deed of Robert N. Fairley and wife is an additional security. The plaintiff brings his action for a foreclosure of said mortgages. John Fairley is dead, and the plaintiff is his administrator with the will annexed, and his widow, heirs at law, and devisees are made…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rollins v. . HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Ten Broeck v. . OrchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
3Cited by4 opinions
- Durant v. . CrowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Nesbitt v. . TurrentineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- McNair v. PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- McNair v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887