Legal Opinion

People v. Barrowclough

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1974No. Crim. 23209PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, J.

Defendant Albert E. Barrowclough, also known as Tracy Rollin Ammerman, was charged by information with perjury in violation of Penal Code section 118 1 as follows: “That on or about the 1st day of June, 1971, at the Department of Motor Vehicles Office in Van Nuys, California, in the County of Los Angeles, he was making application for a driver’s license and was called upon to provide to the Department of Motor Vehicles certain information under oath upon which the license was to have been issued. That pursuant to Vehicle Code Section 12802[ 2 ] this information provided by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. SwannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. RusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. SalemmeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Gilbert v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. People v. BertoldoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API