People v. Salemme
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, J.
This case poses the question whether defendant’s alleged entry into the home of an intended victim for the purpose of selling fraudulent securities constituted burglary. Defendant contends it did not because the purpose of our state’s burglary statutes is “to protect against dangers inherent in intrusion” and, on the facts of this case, “there could be no danger from the mere entry of [the victim’s] residence [for the purpose of selling fraudulent securities].” The People retort that defendant committed burglary when he entered the victim’s residence to commit a felony,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. GauzeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. SearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. HintonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Johnson v. CalvertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.