Ellsworth v. Layton
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Bell, J., entered April 2, 1904, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in au action to foreclose a mortgage. There was testimony tending to show that the building was turned over and accepted as completed in October.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Bell, J., entered April 2, 1904, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in au action to foreclose a mortgage. There was testimony tending to show that the building was turned over and accepted as completed in October. On January 6, upon the demand of the owner, the contractor put metallic flashings over six windows that had been inadvertently omitted, and on February 13, certain drain tile was relaid. There was testimony tending to show that this work was to remedy…
1Per curiam
This action was brought by respondent Ellsworth, as assignee of one Munson, against H. J. Bailey and Edna Bailey, his wife, to recover judgment for *343$2,000, with interest and costs, on two promissory notes, and to foreclose the mortgage of even date with said notes, upon lot 22, block 4, Capitol Hill Addition to the city of Seattle. Different parties who claimed interest in the land were made defendants, among them the appellants in this case-. The particular manner in which the different parties to this action were brought into court is not material, for the pertinent question in the case is…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Rieflin v. GraftonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Kirk v. RohanWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- American Plumbing & Steam Supply Co. v. AlavekiuWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Munson v. American Savings Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906