State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BARCOS, J.. The validity of the trial court’s judgment in this case depends entirely upon whether the act passed by the Second. Called Session of the Forty-Second Legislature in September, 1931 (chapter 2 [Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. arts. 165a-165m]), known as the law “regulating cotton cultivation,” is constitutional. Section 1 of said act (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 165a) declares that the soil is one of the most valuable resources of the state; that the growing of cotton is an industry of first importance; that the preservation and restoration of the soil is essential to the welfare of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Stockwell v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mosheim v. RollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Sheppard v. GiebelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937