Namas Noor Sdn Bhd v. Williams

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

POLOZOLA, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. For the reasons which follow, the plaintiffs motion is denied.

Facts

The defendant, Carlyle Williams, was employed by the plaintiff, Ñamas Noor Sdn Bhd (“Ñamas Noor”). The plaintiff filed this suit against Williams, and his wife, Betty Z. Thompson Williams, to recover $165,994.00 plus interest and costs for a loan, credit card charges and business advances given to the defendants, which remain unpaid. The plaintiff has now filed a motion for…