Rhodes v. Uhl
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Linn District Court. — Milo P. Smith, Judge. Action in equity to rescind a land trade. Opinion states the facts. Decree for the plaintiffs in the court below. Certain of the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.
l. fraud: re-withstanding examination. This action is in equity. It is brought to rescind and set aside a certain contract for the exchange of land. Involved in the exchange are the plaintiff’s homestead and 320 acres of Texas land owned by the plaintiffs, and 126 acres of farm land owned by the defendant Miller. Plaintiffs J base their right to rescind and have the contract and deeds canceled on the claim that the exchange *410was procured by fraud. The prayer of the petition is:
“That the contract entered into between the parties which evidenced the exchange and the deeds made in pursuance of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- First Congregational Church v. TerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Johnson v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Senneff v. BrackeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Mattauch v. Walsh Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Bixby v. CarskaddonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Medical Ass'n of Texas v. Committee for Chiropractic Education, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Webber v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Lietz v. GriemeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Hamaker v. MiddaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Matalone v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1939