Legal Opinion
Davis v. City of New Rochelle
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 1994No. 91 Civ. 1736 (RWS)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Ossie Davis, Napoleon Holmes, Wilhelmina Strong, and Paul Dennis (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated, have moved for an award of attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1973?(e) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 which is opposed by Defendants City of New Rochelle, New York (the “City” or “New Rochelle”), the City Council of the City of New Rochelle (the “City Council”), New York, and the Westchester County Board of Elections (the “County Board”) (collectively, the “Defendants”).
For the reasons set…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Individually ex rel. K.G. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Williams v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Rodriguez v. McLoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Wilder v. BernsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Ragin v. Harry MacKlowe Real Estate Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.